Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH versus MST. KAUSAR PARVEEN

OV, R 20 & O IX, Rr 9 and 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181 The preceding injunction, sets aside the issuance of summons on four occasions for the defendant's service, but non-service each time. The service of the summons is not affected. The defendant's service is being directed by the court through the registered post for 6 1999 1999, due to the absence of the presiding officer on 6 5 1999 by publication in the newspaper. The former proceedings against the defendants on 27 5 1999 must be presented in the notice 6 appearance 1999 on 14 1999 10 1999 passing the previous party decree while filing a petition on 22 11 1999 to set aside the order. In the newspaper, the trial court did not satisfy itself that the plaintiff had been dissatisfied with the order imposing a service of restriction by the court and the appellate court. Mothers are refusing to serve her. The ING record was sent to the respondent by post to prove that the appointment could be called at a specified time, date and place on 6 6 1999, without the presiding officer's absence. There was no action due to availability and no action could be taken. The trial court did not issue a fresh reference to the next date of hearing in such a date against the defendant; the trial will not justify the course adopted by the trial court; the law did not present the defendant personally. Had gone and made their services invalid by reference in the newspaper. The order to file such application shall be from the date of the decree, under Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, wherein the High list of advocates from Sahiwal lawyer