Find a Lawyer

RAFI ULLAH versus DIRECTOR LAND RECORDS, BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE

Article 199 Land Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972, retaining Section 3 Constitutional Appeal The Appellant for Intel Court Appeal Patwari application selection process, after interview, was placed in Serial No.12 while the Respondent stayed on Serial No. 21). The appointment of the provider was implemented. It was challenged by the constitutional petition that the appellant was not made a relevant domicile at the closing date. The request was allowed. The question was whether the constitutional petition could raise matters related to the party's domicile which could be taken on record. Available Appellant's Domicile Certificate is shown for the appellant's place of another Tehsil but was canceled by the District Magistrate of the relevant Tehsil after the cancellation of the Appellant's Domicile was issued by the competent authority after the closing date. However, it has been proven on record that the appellant Not since his request for the appointment of Patwari was a permanent resident of the relevant tehsil, where he was registered as a voter and his father owned the property there. Conflicts regarding the parties' accommodation require determination through the recording of evidence, so such matters were entertained by a civil court constitutional application. Unable to be retained and in the intra-court appeal the High Court set it aside. r \ n \ r \ n jobs for fresh advocates from Haveli Lakha lawyer