MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN QAZI, ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI versus AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Rr 3 (b) (c), 4 (1) (a) (ii), 5 and 6 Government Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964, Rr 11 & 12 (2) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section Article 4 of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Preventing an Annual Increase Prevention of an Annual Increase for a Term of 3 Years Applicant must issue show cause notice, charge sheet and inquire against them. The charges were made after the charges were dropped. The allegations against the applicant were fully proved by the corruption and failure to file the annual declaration of its assets and the unauthorized order passed against the applicant was well argued and The law was based on the question of the importance of the general public as contemplated under Article 1212 (3). Because the constitution was not involved in the petition for leave to appeal, the application, which was otherwise barred from time to time, was dismissed and the appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
