RAFIQUE BIBI versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
Articles 420, 467, 468, 471 and 109 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR abolish the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction, the fact that the FIR FIR against the accused accused of defrauding a woman on immovable property in the registration of the RK and manipulating the record of income while depriving the woman of immovable property. Was filed and FIR was dismissed on the basis that he had filed a case with the accused with a delay of 26 years. The case was civil and non-dependent, and the effect of filing an FIR with delay was always brought to the notice of the trial court; the delay in filing the FIR was not considered fatal in every case by the higher courts. Explained the filing of the FIR. Certainly after that the court will not terminate proceedings on such a score to fully satisfy the delay related to F. The real aspect of the case is that there is no position to initiate the proceedings, ie civil and Mala's push to bring the culprit together was a question of fact, by providing evidence that the Supreme Court had always emphasized the protection of women's rights in relation to landed property. Appeal allowed for change in leave application for appeal and aside the decision passed by the High Court of Appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Khanewal lawyer