Find a Lawyer

MST. KANIZ BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF

302/148/149 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F Accounts given by the prosecution in appeal of the Shariah Bench of the Supreme Court contain. The victim's complainant / widow, medical evidence and recovery - the gun allegedly used by the suspect during the incident and allegedly a 12-bore shotgun - was allegedly presented by the deceased's daughter from her home. And he was allegedly taken away by the accused. , Who was allegedly recovered from his home during the investigation of the case, and other pieces of circumstantial evidence, such as blood-stained land, the blood-stained clothing of the deceased, were found post-mortem. The crime was disclosed by the deceased and the complainant after it was seized that the sister's son was the son of his deceased husband about four days before the incident, along with the son of one of the accused. The defendant and the defendant exchanged, recovered and presented evidence of other circumstances in the Ocular Account, which, in the correct terms, was a federal offense. The ordinance was examined. The Federal Law Shared Court's observation that any material part of the evidence of the prosecution was misread, misunderstood, or misunderstood by the Federal Law Court's observation that the delay in filing the report and the statement of the incident Has happened long before. Even if not considered to be precisely correct, the fate of the case could not be distinguished by any kind of good or bad decision, which led to the Federal Shariah Court properly handling the issue of motions and H law websites from Dadakhel lawyer