Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF versus STATE

Sections 516A and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 392/34, the robbery of a complainant on the superintendent's car was taken away by the two criminals at gunpoint, followed by sections 392/34, P.P.C. The lawsuit was filed under Upon recovery of the aforesaid action by the police on the complainant's identification, the magistrate placed his petition in the Sessions Court, however, on the request of the defendant filed under Section 6161A, the anonymous order under CRPC. Kept separate On the basis of the magistrate's order and in the custody of the respondents the car was directed that the occupant was formed from his possession with registration number, engine number, etc., along with the mechanical design and the body was recovered. ? The car was suspected to have been changed, documenting evidence after the alleged robbery, the first fic, showed that the car recovered from the possession of the respondents was the one who was allegedly forcibly snatched from the complainant at gunpoint. He was attacked by the complainant and for which the complainant filed an FIR magistrate's order to seize the car was based on the principles of law in which no interference was sought. As a result, the session court was diverted and the magistrate was restored accordingly. \ R \ n \ r \ n patent advocate from Chaininda lawyer