Find a Lawyer

WAHID BAKHSH KHOSO versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (b), 4 (3), 7 and 10 Guarantees, school leaving certificate issued by the Medical Officer Approval and Medical Certificate through the Civil Hospital Relations and Counter, signed by the Civil Surgeon, shows that under Section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, an accused under the age of 18 at the time of the commission of the crime. In 2000, the trial court ruled that the trial of the accused under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 was primarily because the accused was a well-mannered person. The police was that it was performed at the age of twenty years and refused to take advantage of the guarantee under Article 10 of the Ordinance is based on the same reasons. In the civil hospital, the medical certificate counters signed by the civil surgeon should not be ignored on the basis of age provided by the police in the account without any supporting evidence or account, to determine their age. The well-structured physical development of Section 7 of the accused of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 facilitated determining a person's age based on a medical report, on a medical certificate from a civil surgeon for trial. There was no justification for relying. If the court had questioned the authenticity of the certificate, it could have constituted a medical board and, on the record board, could resolve the issue by looking at the evidence that clearly showed that the accused at the time of the commission Was under 18 years of age. As a crime and as a child, his case will come under the special jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court. us immigration advocates from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer