Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QUDOOS versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT

ARTICLE 199 Constitutional Appeal Building Authority respondents withdrew the approval of the applicant's building project, which had been using the plot owned by the applicant, and raised objections to the objection to the construction on the applicant's plot. They had no other choice. In order to use the road to enjoy the slum population where the respondents resided, the applicant was first prevented from extending the building and the building authority thereafter withdrew the approved plan. It had the authority to extend the rights and construction of it according to its scale and limits; by law the applicant was not obliged to provide any route or place for the occupants of the plot which was affected by the slum population. In fact, it was the responsibility of the authorities to see that the Katchi population was removed and provide a safe and comfortable passage for the respondents and others like them, but according to the approved plan, no action was taken against the construction. There is no questionable reason for the authorities to lift it. Through the petitioner, the High Court directed that the applicant should examine the fresh application for approval of the construction project and approve it by the building authority within a strict period as per law and request for its modification. The consumer should not be charged any new costs. There was no mistake by her because the approved plan was illegally canceled top advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer