MEHMOOD AHMAD BUTT versus PRESIDENT, MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
In connection with his treatment of refusal of section 25 services, he went abroad. The employee had developed a certificate issued by a foreign doctor, which it was believed the employee was treating. The employee is unable to present his evidence due to his illness and he cannot inform it in a timely manner. His advice could not be ruled out and his advice, pursuing the interests of justice and the principles of law, routinely demanded that the rights of the parties be fixed on further competencies rather than on technical grounds. Have to do. The employee was given an opportunity as his lawyer claimed that the evidence was presented on the one hand and accordingly the remand of the case was obtained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Gilgit lawyer
