Find a Lawyer

IMRAN SHAUKAT versus INCHARGE (INVESTIGATION), POLICE STATION, NAWANKOT, LAHORE

Section 324 / 337H (ii) / 148/149/109 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (6) of the Laws Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court of Appeal Reinvestigation Single Bench of the Lahore High Court The section P (Investigation) was directed to confirm the earlier investigation and then a full bench of the Lahore High Court in its decision on Khizr Hayat VIGP (PLD 2005 Lahore 470). Discussing said the two accused should form an independent opinion to the extent possible. From the point of view of the inquiry confirmation, it was clear that the confirming officer could not formulate or substitute his opinion of the Investigation Officer, and if any inquiry into the opinion of the investigating officer was made, To Section P. The (interrogator) relative, who could then initiate the process under consideration under the provisions of Article 18 (6) of the Police Order, 2002, for a change in investigation, was, thus, an order of magnitude. Even with the aforementioned bench's decision, even Pakistan's highest courts have constitutional, legal oversight and inherent judicial jurisdiction, but by the police DSP (Investigation) directly intervening in the investigation of a criminal case. Was permanently and consciously rebuffed. Inquiries on the recommendation of the Board, provided for in Article 18 (6) of the Police Order 2002, which gave its results and all subsequent investigations or proceedings were declared illegal and without legal effect. Granted, as was not considered in the article. Authorities related to section 18 (6) of the Police Order, 2002 were instructed to allow an appeal of the competent court accordingly. famous lower court advocate from Shorkot lawyer