MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY
R36 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Constitutional Petitioner and Deputy Moderator Stability of Result Returning Officer's Failure, Investigation, Whether Excluded Votes were Rightly Excluded and in favor of Election Candidate The ballot paper was not cast. For which the validity of the Returning Officer was compulsory while stabilizing the results followed the provisions of RR 36 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2005, such results were excluded after physical examination. The inclusion or exclusion of votes cast was likely to be materially affected. The Resolution Returning Officer failed to perform the duty of the Punjab by failing to comply with the provisions of RR 36 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2005. Such failure was not ignored in this case only in terms of convenience or inconvenience. can go. Exercise provided under such rules, otherwise the High Court will not only fail to exercise its constitutional right, the High Court accepts the constitutional application and returns to the Returning Officer the exercise provided under Rule 36 (3). Instructed to do within the appointed time.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer