Find a Lawyer

LAL DIN versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE

Section & pre-13 pre-trial litigation cases The trial court ruled on the defendants' case, stating that the plaintiffs had acted in accordance with the law, which had the highest right to premature dismissal. , But put aside the appeals court, trial court decision and order below, and the plaintiff's witnesses stated in their statements the correct number of years, months, and days when the question was made available to plaintiffs and students Was heard by the Court of Appeal. Mathematically the matter was examined, which was not justified because it was stated more than three years after the incident, contradicting the allegations must be examined in the context of the whole evidence. , Rather than isolation, the evidence of the defendant's witnesses was not examined. And in its proper context, the appellate court made its decision based on the fact that the name of the person who disclosed the fact was not mentioned in the sale of the plant and the name of the person in whose presence it was sought Compensation was performed, it was not even mentioned Generally, as a general rule, there was no need to summarize the evidence. It was stated that exemption could not be sufficient for illegal claimants and all evidence required. Should be kept in mind, but that was not the case and under this the appellate court's decision and order should be set aside. Was arrested and trials were obtained for the next decisions on merit. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mir Ali lawyer