Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED ALIAS MEDU versus STATE

The testimony of the Section 308 evidence was filed by the FIR immediately after the accused's real brother and the deceased's real son, who had a strong motive to falsely implicate his real brother in the murder of his father or The cause was not alleged that he was the only suspect who gave Sota a deadly blow. As a result, the head of the deceased died there and then during the trial it was alleged that he had failed to prove his defense that he was mentally ill at the time of the incident. To no avail because it talked about something. The old polio disorder did not speak of weakness and any mental illness on his right. The suspect's name was a special character in the FIR, in which a fatal suit took place at the head of the murder commission's commission by the accused. The blow was made. There was no question of any alternative or false opportunity by the prosecution's witnesses and the ocular account was confirmed by medical evidence, alleging that he was not a victim of any mental illness. l At the time of the illness, as the claimants are, the trial court had already sentenced them to prison and convicted them under Section 308, PPC and sentenced them: and under section 302 (b). No, the PPC prosecution has proven its case against the accused. Beyond the shadow of a doubt, the trial court rendered a reasonable decision for the accused to be tried and sentenced, which could not be interfered with by the High Court in the jurisdiction of the appeal. immigration advocates phone number from Machh lawyer