ALLIED BANK LTD THROUGH ATTORNEYS versus ASIF AZIZ MEMON
Section 2 (XXX), 46 and 48 (3) Complaint Request Employee status, Employer's determination to maintain a complaint request was challenged by the employer on the basis that the employee who was a bank branch Performing his duties as a manager's administrative affairs, he had a duty of care and management and did not fall under the jurisdiction of the employer when employed to reject claims made by employers. , He had to face some documents related to the nature of his job which the Labor Court did not allow. Was given On the basis of such documents which state that the documents were not filed with the respondent statement by the employer, the nature of the employee is in dispute, in which case the employer faces a witness with the said documents. Is not allowed to do so, he will not be able to prove his case. The evidence and the employer will have no opportunity to contest the testimony of the aforementioned documents. According to the Labor Court order, the blood could not be retained, documents from a witness were encountered, it could be recorded and objected to as the case was being prepared for its preparation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Leepa lawyer