Find a Lawyer

FARRUKH SAEED KHAN versus ANIS-UR-REHMAN BHATTI

Article 14 Consideration of Factors Reasonable Claims for Compensation Claims for Discrimination and Discrimination Consideration of the court's jurisdiction is generally difficult to assess reasonable compensation, and in those cases it was the judge's discretion In this case on the facts, determine the amount to be given to a person who suffers such loss. The second factor was that the conscience of the court should be satisfied that the harm done, Article 14 of the Constitution provided that the dignity of the human beings will be irrevocable There was a verdict and the plaintiff had a legitimate right to defend his good name and the defendant had no right to defame him, where the evidence available on the record suggests that the defendant had defamed the defendant, mentally and physically. Was hurt, and by damaging the plaintiff's good name, the plaintiff found himself suffering from the consequences. If it is proved that the defendant has defamed him in his family and business circle, he is liable to pay the plaintiff and the plaintiff waives the general damages and permanent injunction to the extent that the defendant. Had no right to do so. The plaintiff's reputation in general and in the friends and constituents of the plaintiff is particularly relief that the defendant can be barred from making claims of any form and nature and if the defendant has the full right to recover legal liabilities So before any legitimate forum before r \ n, he could prove it registration advocate from Gari Mori lawyer