Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHID versus PROVINCIAL ELECTION COMMISSIONER

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), RRR 35, 36, 37 and 38, Submission of Constitution 19 Reporting Error by Returning Officer, Correction while Stabilizing and Preparing Vote Counts in Form XV and XVI, Returning Officer Error 28 votes were registered against the symbol of the respondents who actually got 224 votes whose count was erroneously displayed against the applicant's mark, such error in the form XV, and XVI Was corrected by the Returning Officer and the respondents raised the petition through the Applicant was that the Returning Officer could not review the result. The petitioner cannot be allowed to take advantage of the mistake made by the Returning Officer, who made a false count against the Respondent's mark; the applicant did not file a copy of Form XIII, in which The original vote was there. If the count of each polling station was listed on Form 12, the same could have exposed the misunderstanding of the applicant's claim, a copy of the counting of the votes of each polling station in Form XII, which was kept on record by the Returning Officer, The applicant did not make any inquiries nor did he doubt the accuracy of the counting of votes, which was the twelfth primary document on which the counting of stable votes in Forms XV and XVI even depended on the respondents. A typographical error can be corrected by the Returning Officer, naming successful candidates This process is mandated under the Local Government elections, the controversial role of holding free and fair elections. , 2005 Another failed um top advocates from Shangla lawyer