GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB versus SHAHID MEHMOOD BUTT
Article 4 Quantum of penalties, reduction of proportional stability and needless employee The public servant did not comply with his transfer orders; despite his appeal being rejected by the appellate authority, the civil servant was absent from his duties and the official residence. The authorities also imposed a huge punishment for the abuses. The service tribunal changed the reduction sentence to a lower census that the non-compliance of the transfer order during the appeal / representation transfer was not disobedient to the employee, the representation was denied against the transfer order in writing. On which he was instructed to hand over this charge and public accommodation but did not comply with the ineffective discipline and order regarding the establishment of public servants, so he avoided any mistake. Were. The amount of fines was not agreed to by the Supreme Court service tribunal because merely by filing an appeal / representation against the transfer order, the public servant could not remain in the place of his choice until the transfer order was processed. Was not in a position in this matter. The service tribunal's theory, if confirmed, would give each public employee a license to file representation against the transfer order and to stay where he did not want to move. As this would lead to administrative chaos, the Supreme Court could not find any reason for the reduction in penalties by the service tribunal and arbitrary consideration was exercised by the service tribunal in arbitrary consideration, thereby obeying the law. Did not happen and that is the desired principle
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Risalpur lawyer