Find a Lawyer

MESSRS A.M. INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED versus AIJAZ MEHMOOD

Sections 15 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 85 (3) request for withdrawal, dismissal of the appellate authority on the sole application dismissing the petitioner's dismissal application which the person who signed the removal request Was not authorized by the applicant company through an off contract. Neither the directors nor any power of attorney were hanged in their favor for the eviction proceedings; the appellate authority also found that in the absence of the existence of a legally registered company, applicants through the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies. Company name has been removed from the Register of Companies. The appellate authority had an ineligible applicant company and the constitutional application for the withdrawal petitioner was dismissed, against which the order of the appellate authority was also dismissed by the High Court person, who had filed the withdrawal proceedings on behalf of the company. There was no formal authorization, no legal flaws or mistakes. URT found in the doctrine of jurisdictional High, which was not open to any exception, was dismissed for appeal leave \ r \ n \ r \ n top advocates from Kamokey lawyer