Find a Lawyer

INAYATULLAH versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL

Arts 4, 25 and 212 (3) Notification No. F 3 12/96 SA (FDE) A III, Date, 49 2000 Reorganization of General Cadre Reasonable Classification of Four Level Structure Scheme, Principal Directors Physical Education (DP) E) and Physical Training Instructors (PTI) have claimed that they were discriminated against by not including `` the general cadre / the jurority general cadre of the teachers of the school, '' who stood on 11, 1999, Was added. The four-level structure scheme includes the upgrading and re-designation of the general cadre of school teachers, with no cadre affiliation or cadre consisting of PTIs and other staff members, including DPs and PTIs. Discrimination was claimed, was not vacated by any substance. It can be legitimately claimed that notification number F 3 12/96 SA (FDE) A III, dated 49/2000, was the letter and spirit of the Supreme Court's decision in the case titled Ahmed Hussein. Director Education Islamabad and others reported 2001 SCMR 955 status. As per the special class decisions regarding the entire class and category of the school teachers of the Physical Education Cadre of Islamabad / Federal Area, which is a notification of Federal Government Notification No. F3 12/96 SA (FDE) A III, 49 2000 , Did not disrespect the Article 25 Articles read with Article 4 of the Constitution and was not prejudiced ever since he started becoming a member of the Physical Education Department staff of the Federal Government, Islamabad / Federal Area. Has happened and since then it has been treated as a separate group. As a whole, who was never included in the minor cadre of teachers and does not merge immigration advocates contact from Zhob lawyer