Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOM, E&ST (ADJUDICATION-II)

AXXVI Constitution of Pakistan (1973), petition for review of Article 188 decision, delayed the Supreme Court's decision, where instead of remanding the matter to the High Court, the petition for leave to appeal was changed. Made and put aside the approved decision. Instead of pointing out any inaccuracies appearing on the record face by the petitioner regarding the accuracy of the High Court, an attempt was made to reopen the case on the points already noted in the judgment pending and in the judgment It was decided that the petitioner's conviction in support of the revision was a matter. In reviewing the petitioner had dealt with the principle of law in the main application, the petition sought to argue the case in good faith that the review was not merely a lie, that there was a mistake in the decision or someone else. The view of the matter was also possible as the Supreme Court was not obliged to its decision and could later review the law announced by it, if the circumstances demanded that the power of review be exercised sparingly and only those non- In minor cases in which some important aspect of the matter was escaped or not considered by the Supreme Court notice and such error was evident in the decision and the decision was taken after deliberation. ? Cannot revise decision on jurisdiction by the parties to review material points on a foundation-based review request rejected us immigration advocates from Mubarik Pur lawyer