Find a Lawyer

MIR ZAMAN versus STATE

Article (c) Definition of Evidence A reduction in a conviction complaint should not be an investigation officer of the case itself, but unless serious misconduct is caused by the dual role of the investigating officer, the same cannot be said of the investigation. Could not be illegal and could not be forwarded, it was alleged, in this case the Investigation Officer failed to identify any wrongdoing or motive, however in this regard During the cross-examination, even the slightest suggestion was not made to the investigating officer. The same cannot be said about the investigating officer. That it is based on any kind of enmity and that it cannot be suggested to any hostility or its purpose to the testimony of another prosecutor who made the statement that the accused had been recovered in the presence of Charis. And it confirmed the recovery memo, the lengthy investigation that targeted both of the prosecution's witnesses, but no material contradictions or contradictions could be identified The defendant's statement regarding the defendant's innocence was one such thought. And it is likely that a false story was created to create a defense of the accused, The exclusion cannot be predicted to reduce the punishment it receives. Has already passed, it cannot be said to be irrational The presumption of punishment already imprisoned was considered sufficient to cover the resources of justice. top advocates from Lahore lawyer