Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NISAR versus STATE

Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10/18 denied the record of bail that the complainant was motivated or falsely implicated in the case. It was difficult for anyone to express disrespect. What, for no good reason, was the fact that the five-day delay in filing an FIR in the facts and circumstances at the expense of defrauding your spouse was not very important. The complainant's claim was that the defendants were sufficiently illicit, the first material available, with the accused charged under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), CCP Bell Was denied the circumstances under the circumstances \ r \ n criminal advocate from Kakul lawyer