Find a Lawyer

RANA FAZAL ELAHI versus STATE

Articles 409, 420, 468, 471 and 218 of the Corruption Act (Part II of 1947), section 5 (2) define the evidence. The prosecution's witnesses, who were all public witnesses, did not falsely associate any personal grudges, unlawful desires or enmity with him. The prosecution's evidence in this case was based on official records and did not face any material contradiction or contradiction; the results found in the trial court were very convincing and, according to the evidence in the record, the empty bag References and misconduct questions were put to the accused during his investigation under Section 2342, CRPC, though his exact number was not disclosed to him, leading to The type was not prejudiced and was seized and misappropriated by empty land bags. It was set on the record. After the trial court made a reasonable decision, it did not guarantee any interference with the High Court's appeal of the charges. d accordingly dismissed law websites from Swabi lawyer