ISHER SINGH versus SUPERINTENDENT CUSTOMS (TRAFFIC), ALLAMA IQBAL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, LAHORE
Sections 126, 142, 171 and 168 (1) Constitution of the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement, 1965 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the transport of goods in transit in Afghanistan for the first time the custody of the goods, and then for the confiscation. Premature dismissal and seizure of the immediate response to the declaration along with the authority report will have precedence over the report, resulting in contradictions for the reasons listed in both such reports and the customs act. Will be responsible for repatriation under Section 142 of 1969. While conflicting reports of confiscated and liable goods being liable to be sold under section 3 under will create suspicion in relation to transparent proceedings, the custody of the goods itself proves that the Customs Act The three prerequisites of section 142 of 1969 were fulfilled, therefore, the applicant will be entitled to return the goods upon leaving Pakistan, the distribution of goods will be made under the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement, 1965 High Court has applied (Afghan National). Approved the constitutional request, leaving Pakistan to return the goods to Torkham border.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
