7th XVII, R 3 Failure to present evidence despite the notice being made in the party court / The court's right to discontinue the party's right to present evidence despite the evidence of the party whose record was closed Has been sued by the Scope Plaintiff, in which the case was brought to the Plaintiff on his request and the parties were sued, he got four opportunities to increase his evidence and on two such occasions. He was warned of further opportunity at the last opportunity, yet he failed to present his evidence. O. XVII, R 3, Provisions of CPC, Plaintiff The evidence was discontinued and the case was dismissed for lack of evidence The plaintiff's argument was that he should have asked the court to at least record his statement. The right to present evidence was discontinued) in any case where action was required against a corrupt party and the evidence had to be closed because the case was widely and nominally named. nO XVII, R 3, CPC's misconduct, the court was not obliged to suspend the case in any way and to adjourn the case, and the date for appearing and seeking legal proceedings thereafter. But there was no need to examine yourself as a witness. The court should not reject its plea for appearing before the court and as a witness, but it would be appropriate that where the party was present, the court applied the evidence XVII, R 3, CPC and closed the evidence on a fixed date. To do The party itself should ask for a chance to appear as its own witness, and in its order sheet the same fact
