Find a Lawyer

PHARMACIA PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH FINANCE DIRECTOR versus SOCIAL SECURITY COURT, JUDGE SOCIAL SECURITY COURT PUNJAB, LAHORE

Notice of payment of less than contribution to sections 57 and 59 social security, complaint complaint against demand for start time limit was amended by the Institution and it was found wrong that the institution The amount was directed to work again, though the Partition Claims Institute's appeal was upheld and it was said that the order was dismissed on the grounds that the complaint was banned. The question was whether the notice demanding the commencement of the limitation period for filing complaints was final or not in which the Institution demanded a record which was not examined. And to arrive at the final data, the required check will be the admission amount, which was not the amount due and the notice was not reported, therefore, starting the deadline for the purpose of filing the complaint could not be considered final here. Even the grievance proceedings in which the order of record was ordered to be re-examined and the demand for re-examination was amended and even the revised W as it was found that the institute The source further endorsed that a notice of demand was not final to begin the ban period. Writ did not apply his mind to the judicial notice of appeal of the text and facts of the case, had high accepted. The court and remand for the case were remanded, which is believed to be pending before the Social Security Court. best advocate from Talamba lawyer