Find a Lawyer

HABIB ULLAH versus MST. KAUSAR

Section,, & ??? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The closure of evidence by the Presiding Officer of the Family Court of the Court of Appeal, being on leave on the due date for the recording of the applicant's evidence, Readers postponed because the applicant was unavailable, on the date the hearing was adjourned, the Judge Family Court closed the applicant's evidence after refusing to provide the applicant any further opportunity to present evidence, Appeal offered by court readers not on petitioner's offer by adjustment, for trial court It is appropriate to provide the applicant with another opportunity to prepare his evidence, which may be a day or two, with the Reader's Court authorizing the date for recording of evidence in the absence of a presiding officer. It was disastrous, unless the Chief Justice authorized the absence of any express authority by a specific order, so it would be disastrous to allow readers to read the court-issued hearing dates. Decide, with no legal authority nor any legal effect, and as a result Judge Family Court The disputed order of closing the evidence of the borrower was set aside, in which one or his permission was directed. Two opportunities for the applicant to present evidence and ultimately decide the case till the due date, without unnecessarily postponing the applicant. best advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer