Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR KHAN versus STATE

Before the arrest of Section 498 Explanation Code (XLV of 1860), section 324/506, the complainant's grant shows that the story was exaggerated to present a case under section 324, PPC. Has been presented, under which the first offense was not made a crime under Section 506, CR. The PC that came in the first part was apparently excluded from the facts of the case, which was guaranteed, the two sides took different standings, the motive of the accused in the case and his wife, who are present in the court, A thorough investigation is needed. The complainant filed a complaint about the wrongdoing of the case, alleging that the wife of the accused had been falsely accused in such cases. It cannot be denied that the complainant then amended his story which was not mentioned in the statements of the alleged witnesses recorded under Section 161, CR PC, the same day, otherwise the Advocate The chamber of the complainant was affiliated with the Advocate's Chamber, the incident was not observed or attracted to the site and was not quoted because the witnesses were not previously involved in a case that was overseas. Was coming and came to Pakistan. Even when the time of the incident was not mentioned in the FIR, the complainant did not suffer from fireworks, the accused could not be jailed for pistol recovery only. The trial against the suspects looked suspicious. Some suspicious cases were registered, in which case the accused's interim arrest warranted criminal advocate from Mingora lawyer