Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 The Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the Section 161 bail, the grant of the charges against the accused was to provide employment to the complainant. Received in installments in a five year delay. Authorities were lodged a complaint and no clear explanation was provided. Aye did not mention any date, month, year and time about the payment of the money, there was no recovery from the accused even though the case has already been sentenced. For three to three years under Section 5 (2) of Section 161, PPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, but they filed an appeal against their aforementioned conviction, which, under these circumstances, The convicted person could not be called and he was the only person entitled to bail if he was convicted by a competent court law and finally decided on appeal. Bail cannot be denied for reasons. Previously convicted by the trial court in the trial, the accused could not be kept behind bars waiting for the final end of the trial, which would not be possible in the near future, for such indefinite periods. No useful purpose can be laid behind bars. Denied as a punishment because there was no concept of punishment prior to sentencing, the offenses against the accused did not fall under the prohibited clause of 497, the PC accused was allowed to bail, under circumstances r \ n \ r \ n power of attorney advocate Toru lawyer