SHAH MUHAMMAD versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
RR 39, 40 and 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition Declaration of election result Clarification error, Applicant's correction, Stable statement in Form XV were voted less than the respondent and contributed the same result. Was described in the first. Form XVI, which was prepared by the Returning Officer, but in Part L of this form, was registered as the winning candidate due to the mismatch, the names of the applicants and the respondents were applied to the Provincial Election Commissioner. It was said that he had cast 440 votes and he was the son of Noor Khan but due to the confusion over such names, the petitioner, who was the son of Syed Khan, forwarded the selected matter to the Returning Officer. , Which corrected the record and issued a revised result, thus completely misleading a scholar, the provincial election commissioner or Turning officer has been deleted and can not be said that, unknown to the petition without such optimization, something that did not warrant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer