MALIK SAJJAD AHMAD versus STATE
Section 302/324/148/149 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 7 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 439 accused were declared commissions, the trial court granted the prosecutor Depending on the school leaving certificate. The 23-year-old's authenticity of the said certificate was denied by the parties to the authenticity of the other documents presented by the parties, so it was challenged by the trial court as well, so, the matter was valid before the Medical Board for voting. As sent out, the medical board's opinion was 18 years (plus or minus one year) and, as such, they were within the scope of section 2 (b) of the Medical Board's Jouinville Justice System Ordinance, 2000 report, Under the circumstances, I lost weight. The trial court rejected the minor criminal review as the deciding factor in determining the age of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jaranwala lawyer
