Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus MST. JANAT BI

A. XLI, Rr 22 and 33 and 5 100 Second Appellate Appeals Respondents attacked the two courts' finding that a dispute had been settled in connection with the dispute over the death of a respondent's father, which was alleged by the courts. Not reading the misrepresentation and the evidence, a wrong conclusion was reached which resulted in serious injustice to the defendant. Appellant's opinion was that since the defendant had neither filed any cross appeal nor filed any cross objection against the court's finding on the said matter, it could not be allowed. The challenge stated that under the provisions of RC22KR22 of the APLC, a second appeal can be upheld against the respondents for legal reasoning, not just on any basis decided in their favor. , But for this purpose and for that purpose the respondents were not required to file any cross objection. The respondent will also be able to support the judgment of the court on the basis of which it has not been decided in his favor. Was. It cannot be said that the respondent is not able to control the outcome of the case decided against him. The respondent is fully capable of attacking a decisive case against which OXLI, CPC KR 33 Was appealed by the appellant on behalf of the appellants. The appellate court was also empowered to approve any decree and to approve any decree which had to be passed. Syed Razzaq also ordered the appellate court to approve any further order or decree as required. This is only against a section of the decree ask a advocate free from Lala rukh lawyer