Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ versus BARKAT HUSSAIN

Two sons of the deceased landowner and two sons of the land owner in the dispute in relation to the declaration and cancellation of Articles 39 and 42 of the Convention of Convention (10 of 1984), Article 114 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Had two daughters Of the deceased owner's sons, who was the father of the appellant, the deceased landlord passed away during the life of the landlord, the change in the property of the deceased owner was confirmed in the presence of the defendant, who was the second son of the deceased owner and The appellant's uncle was the one who made the statement before the Revenue. The officer wants to give the appellant / his nephew the full share of his late father, who died in connection with the life of the deceased owner, and the estate of the deceased owner is subject to change according to his legal The status and accuracy were challenged by the defendant alleging that the change, which was sanctioned in violation of Islamic law, was collective and was against the defendant's rights. The palette on the basis; that it was not sustained on estoppel basis and the civil court had no jurisdiction in this case because the Revenue Officer Trial Court had already challenged the mutation, but the appellate court pronounced the same decision. The suit against which the appellant filed an appeal was heard. Confusing because the measles number was not mentioned, it was terminated because the case was escaped by the respondents, which contained sufficient detail to identify the suit property, in which the appellant contends that the civil court Case filed before West Pakistan Land Revenue advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer