Find a Lawyer

SULLAH MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Articles 6 and 14 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section II8 and Article 10 suits allowed the trial court to continue, despite the ban on the case for termination of the premature suit. However, there is evidence of the ban in the Appeal Court. , Banned with the exception of time such as waste case, which was filed with delay of four days after completion of four months from registration of sale deed, possession of suit land on same day. The shopkeeper was handed over. The registration lawsuit did not state that the sale process was concealed by a fraudster or was excluded from knowledge of the rights or title to which it was based, to be considered through a registered sale deed, The pre-emptor could not be benefited under section 18 of the Appellate Court of Limitation Act, 1908, which, under the circumstances, properly declared the case. Because the defendant sought delay in filing a lawsuit with a delay of four days, he could not prove that he was ill and under treatment during that period. The appeal against the judgment was a false story against the appeal. The court below was, inappropriate, in the circumstances lawer from fb area from Rawalpindi lawyer