ANTI-NARCOTICS FORCE (A.N.F.) THROUGH REGIONAL DIRECTOR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE NARCOTICS DIRECTORATE versus GHAFOOR KHAN THROUGH GUARDIAN
Sections 2 (1) (F), 21, 29, 31 and 43 Customs Act (IV 1969), Section 2 (S) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition / Forfeiture of Property Authority notified to the Special Judge In the interests of the respondents, being obtained by the victim / predecessor, as a result of drug trafficking, can be seized in favor of the state special court, after issuing the showcase notice to the defendant and hearing them, by his order. The Special Appellate Court, which was responsible for confiscating some of the defendants' assets, ordered the Special Court to set aside the judgment and confiscate the properties, they were dismissed. He was. After the special appellate court dealt with the matter, it was difficult to discuss all the evidence presented by the parties before the Special Court of Appeal discussed the factual issue. Aspects and the Trafficking Prevention Act 1977 returned their decision in light of the provisions of section 31 and other relevant sects. Ions of the said Act will not require the intervention of the High Court in the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction in the search of the facts recorded as a result of the proper appreciation of the evidence by which the jurisdiction was further restricted. Was not successful when it succeeded in approving the controversial decision. , The appellate court had traveled beyond its jurisdiction or held that the decisions were without legal jurisdiction. , Under which special court investigations were set aside, the High Court did not demand interference.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
