Defining evidence in the FIR filed after 2/2 hours of the incident was natural, self-explanatory and the delay report cannot be declared as the complainant is a close relative and has no animosity or motive against the accused. This cannot possibly be substituted. The location of the incident was assisted for the original culprit of the complaint, the recovery of the incidents and the medical evidence recovered from the occasion proved that the accused was fired from the shotgun, the shotgun was not recovered. The offenses indicated in the evidence of litigation were neither material nor any judicial decision passed by the trial court based on the correct application of the law and the correct evaluation of the evidence and the circumstances of the offenders. Punishment and punishment were retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
