Find a Lawyer

AMIR ZAMAN versus STATE

Section 514 bond confiscation charge for which appellants stand on bail, absent and appellants fail to present them in court, the court seized half of the bail bonds, which are guaranteed for the accused Were under legal obligation to discharge their duty under the bonds of the bailiffs, the appellants themselves have accepted that responsibility, so it will not lie in their mouths. That due to their financial condition, they are unable to pay the amount of bonds they receive. And since they stand on bail for the offender's charity and without any financial gain, there was no legal restriction that the bail amount could not be completely seized in the bail where the accused was held on bail bonds. Was leaped, the entire amount of bail will be liable to forfeiture guarantees, in the present case, to present the accused in the trial case in court, having already seized half of the bail The soft verdict was adopted, but the effective order is correct, proper and legal; it did not demand the intervention of the High Court. Within its jurisdiction advocate from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer