Find a Lawyer

SHAMSUDDIN QAZI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Arts 25 and 1993 Constitutional Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Civil Service Discrimination Service Group Issues Not related to the Terms and Conditions of Service The applicant's complaint was that upon the availability of vacancies in the Income Tax Group, he would again issue the Income Tax Group. Was entitled to be allocated, in the same circumstances others were reassigned that the applicant's plea was that the re-allocation was a violation of Article 25 of the Constitution and the legality of this permanent exercise. Authorities could not contradict the factual position that there was a permanent action. Due to vacant vacancies, the re-allocation of various candidates did not deal with the Petitioner's other responsibilities and due to Officer Shahi he was treated differently. The Service Tribunal did not have the jurisdiction to reallocate the service group. Because the terms and conditions of service did not cover them, the ice bar of jurisdiction contained in Article 1212 of the Constitution was not attracted by the petition, in the circumstances it was allowed famous supreme court advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer