Find a Lawyer

SHAHEEN AIR PORT SERVICES versus HAIDER ABBAS RIZVI

Section O15 (E) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Sections 46 and 48 request for termination of service Appeal to a High Court employee, who was unable to attend his duties for 3 days due to illness. After the show was finished it ended. Three days after employers reported notices and allegations of corruption as allegations of corruption, about 10 years ago, when the employee was absent some days and on the basis of the act against which the employee No action was taken against the employers, alleging that the employee had `` fallen in appreciation ''. Habits \ As set forth in section O15 (e) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Arden, 1968 and the matter of employees is a standing order of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. Came under the purview of Shariah (E) of 15, the first of which was dealt with by an unusual absence. And in the second part, there was a case of absence of leave for 10 days, which the employee had been absent for only three days, in which case the second clause of the employees did not come into force in the act which was done about 10 years ago and for which the employers No action was taken against him by. Employee habits will not arise and this is beyond the scope of the definition of 'employee' The employee's case will not fall under the jurisdiction of c ???? Labor court search, no intervention was required \ r \ n \ r \ n patent advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer