MESSRS HABIB BANK LTD versus MESSRS BELA AUTOMOTIVES LTD
Sections 9 (2) and 22 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 High Court of Appeal Maintainability Bank filed an appeal against the order under which a single High Court Judge filed the accounts, injunction, Was ordered to leave to defend the lawsuit filed by the company against the company. And the damages caused matters, so it was objected to the maintenance of the appeal so that an appeal can be filed against the decision, decree, sentence or final judgment under section 22 (1) of the Financial Institutions (Financial Compensation) Ordinance 2001. ? The Single Judge allowed the Appellant's leave to appear and defend the case by an unlawful order, not against the interim order passed by the Banking Court, and for the final judgment of the Sod passed by the Single Judge. In order to settle matters, the final order in view of the provisions of Section 22 (Finance Recovery) Ordinance of Financial Institutions 2001 was dismissed due to non-submission of the appeal order, which did not settle the entire case before the Banking Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Quetta lawyer