Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NISAR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) and 324 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), according to medical evidence, the deceased and his injured brother (complainant) suffered repeated fire, one of which was the fatal shot. In the main part. On his body and it cannot be said that only one of the assailants' brother survived fortunately, who also sustained severe gunshot wounds to the left side of his chest, according to witnesses. Were involved in supporting the incident. Mere speculations or any hypothetical speculation will not be doubted, since the record of the prosecution's evidence has not emerged, it does not appear that anything before the incident was alleged to have provoked provocation. I was charged with firing, recovering an investigation officer's failure or failure to commit a crime that fled after the commission of the crime and, when evacuated from the scene of the crime, e. And on the prosecution's case in the unusual account of the incident, with the help of other evidence related to the disputed situation. There was no adverse effect. advocate from Jaranwala lawyer