Find a Lawyer

SINDH EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, KARACHI versus MESSRS PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, CLUB ROAD, KARACHI

In the Offer, Section 2 (30) was expressed in connection with the payment of the contribution of the payment of the collateral guarantee payment between the employer and the authorities regarding the wages and une compensations \ employees and the employer. Payment is not a part. Justification of employees 'wages In simple terms wages are any form of payment that can be defined as the compensation of a person or service whose compensation is more important than `wages' in respect of allowance or payment of services. Can join. Among other payments made and the definition of the term wages was comprehensive and reasonable in section 2 (30) of the Provincial Employees Security Social Security Ordinance, 1965, and occasional payments that were not considered part of the wage. , All payments made under one. The law or instrument, contract or settlement should be construed as part of the wage as a legal or contractual obligation was not specifically excluded from the definition of wage under any law of the social protection contribution. The concept was to promote the welfare of the working class, in which the payment of financial expenses and expenses for the welfare of the employees and their expenses were included in the definition of wages, therefore, the provision of provincial employees \ The Social Security Ordinance, 1965, cannot be construed in such a way as to destroy its purpose and defeat its purpose. If the employer paid an employee for the service rendered by him in payment of his contract or legal obligation, the amount paid under section 2 (30) of the Provincial Employee / Social Security Ordinance, 1965, Be considered as top advocate from Islamabad lawyer