Find a Lawyer

ALI IMRAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 34 Guarantees, Grant of Further Inquiry Only a piece of evidence against two unidentified persons who committed the robbery. There was the recovery of the mobile cards that the accused had presented to the police prosecution and said that the card had to be linked to the crime and, for that reason, the card should have been put through the complainant's identity test. And if the complainant had identified the same, it could have been used as a piece of evidence against the accused, the cards were not properly identified and no other evidence would have been the case for the accused, 497 (2), the CCP alleges that he is entitled to exemption in bail, he was admitted in bail, under the circumstances. immigration advocates email from Jacobabad lawyer