Find a Lawyer

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN SHIPPING LINES THROUGH ATTORNEY versus HASSAN ALI & CO. COTTON (PVT.) LIMITED

The plaintiffs for enforcement of Sections 8 and 7 claim that the arbitrator has no jurisdiction and that the award is against the law and public policy in Pakistan and that the arbitrators commit the misconduct, The arbitrator did not defend the proceedings in the first place and consequently did not object that the arbitrator had no jurisdiction to arbitrate the matter, no reason was assigned by the defendant to question the jurisdiction of the arbitrator. There is a mediation clause in the charter party, dispute is settled, dispute notice, appointment of arbitrator, arbitrator Claiming and arbitrators issue numerous notices, faxes and issue letters to defendants, who did not choose to defend and award, it was not disputed that the defendants' negligence in their objections The claim was. Without notifying him but the notice, letters and faxes of the various specific dates mentioned in the award were not denied by the plaintiff's defense lawyer, arguing that the High Court did not raise the award request without notice. That the arbitrator has no jurisdiction to arbitrate unless an acceptable ground can be proved. No material urged on this matter was emphasized before the High Court. There was a similar issue with regard to the objection that the award is a violation of Pakistani law and public policy. No law or public policy can state that. Because the award violated the same object. The defendant, in the circumstances, had no merit which was upheld by the High Court female advocates from Shahdad Kot lawyer