Find a Lawyer

RAJA AMEER HAIDER versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF MINORITIES, CULTURE, SPORTS, TOURISM AND YOUTH

Sections 42 of the Ivy Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act (XIII of 1975), Sections 8 and 14 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Application IQ Trust Property Declaration Civil Court, Non-recording of jurisdiction for refusing to dismiss case Plaintiff pleads with the impression that the suit property is not a vacated trust property but the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's dismissal was dismissed by the appellate court, but the appellate court amended. The use of jurisdiction was rejected. The case is because the case was withheld under the law, it was submitted by the plaintiff that the trial court should have decided this request after recording the evidence. Whether the property is a property eviction trust in the event of a dispute over a property, it was the chairman of the Evaci Trust Properties Board, whose exclusive jurisdiction is under the Evaci Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 19. ? 75, to decide the issue and it will be decided by the civil courts, under section 14 of the Disclosure Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act 1975, instead of referring to the civil courts, the plaintiff cannot be known. Was, should have approached the chairman. The Iwaike Board of Trustees, having raised questions about the status of the property, had no jurisdiction in the civil case and the reviewing court rightly rejected the plaintiff, whose order equaled the dismissal of the case, The trial court made the correct decision without presenting the required issues. And to enable the parties to present evidence advocates from Rajanpur lawyer