SAHIB DAD KHAN versus LAL KHAN NIAZI
Section 24 Property Sales Value Extension of time to submit a deposit to the sale price The concept of the probability of the potential value of the property before the time of the justification deposit is to comply with the determination of the potential value of the property when pre-occupied. To sue for The trial court dismissed the preamptor importer on the basis that the pre-emptor failed to collect a third of the sale price, as noted in the interchange appeal filed by the pre-emptor against the trial court's decision. The appellate court was instructed by the trial court to determine the probable value of the suit property after the first case was filed and then the order to submit 1 / 3rd of this value by the prosecution court as set by the trial court. I pay In the first instance, it was a legal error to exclude the pre-emptor suit, as it is time to extend the deposit amount to 1 / 3rd of the value shown in the mutation, while the Punjab Pre-Emission Act of 1991 In view of the provisions of section 24, no extension was necessary to collect such amounts, provided that Section 24 of the Act expressly provided for the collection of 1 / 3rd of the sale. In any case, the value of the property in cash cannot be extended in any case which is less than 30 days after the case is filed. Both courts adopted a method that was not legal, the trial court acted without jurisdiction because the submission by the pre-emptor was not solely because of his error but because of it. The court, which had not received the notice at the above mentioned price in the mutanturvati court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Warah lawyer