Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMAD SIDDIQI versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, CITY MIANWALI

Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 294A, 294B, 420, 468 and 471 Prevention of Punjab Gambling Ordinance (VII of 1978), despite the knowledge of the Constitution's hearing of the Constitution, the relevant F.I. The petition for cancellation of Section H of R was filed in the court a day before the date of the hearing, which clearly showed that the High Court was quick to dismiss the proceedings and record the proceedings. The entire action was taken, which also shows that the Deputy Inspector General of Police ordered another. Upon inquiry into the matter, the inspector / section HO contradicted the search of the first investigating officer and according to police, the subsequent inquiry officer found that the incident was genuine and proceeded to apologize to Inspector / Section H. Was. Fresh inquiries were made and only a favorable report was obtained with the idea of safety and prevention of the certified. The certified police officer could not be denied any action on the basis of the present FIR, which is a lie. Was granted and was initially declared fake by the police itself, cannot be allowed to proceed. This would be equivalent to allowing such an FIR to be placed in the field. Unlawful use of the law, which cannot be allowed to apply for a constitution, the FIR was dismissed by the High Court and declared without legal authority and without any legal effect. famous lower court advocate from Dandot lawyer