AKHTAR ALI versus MST. HALEEMA BIBI
Under Section 4242, the case for the transfer of land to a relative under the authority of the lawyer was inherited by the plaintiff along with the plaintiff because the plaintiff's joint owners' suit alleged that their plaintiff's brother Has moved to the right of the said land. His plaintiff's son, himself representing the plaintiff's plaintiff's attorney general, was sentenced by a trial. The power of attorney's testimony could not be presented because of his absence from the village. The power of attorney's execution was proved and the matters were lawful and with the plaintiffs deliberating that there was no evidence that the plaintiff's brother was appointed as his counsel, or that he consulted with the plaintiff. After the land proceeded to transfer to the plaintiff's son, the FS or any consideration was given to the plaintiffs for proof of the same claim and the testimony of the witnesses on record shows that the defendant The plaintiff was not consulted or notified before transferring the said land in favor of K's son. The son had lied to each other during the evidence - these statements in matters of deliberation are the fact that a person was given authority over the land by means of the land to separate the land. Do it. He proceeded to transfer the land to his closest relative, though his son's petition was rejected in the circumstances. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Sanghi lawyer