AMJAD FAROOQ versus GULL HAMEED KHAN ROKHRI, MINISTER FOR REVENUE RELIEF AND CONSOLIDATIONS
Article 199 The use of the dispute between the parties' supervisory powers, the parties on the basis of the recommendation of the Development Committee of the Department, before the Service Tribunal decided and the Board of Revenue decided to implement the decision. The Minister of the Departmental Promotion Committee passed an order and ordered the service tribunal to stop the order indirectly. The validity authority fails to disclose any law or authority that has given the Minister the power to review or amend judicial orders made by the Service. The constitutional jurisdiction was never considered by the tribunal and the High Court as a general power of oversight in the government to include the power to interfere with the judicial duties of a particular legal authority, unless in this statute No clause exists on its own. The power to go after the fact finding was recorded by the service tribunal and the revenue revenue officials complied with the tribunal's order as the order of the service tribunal was not challenged by any party before the Supreme Court. Was made, such an order had been finalized which was approved by the Minister. The authority and the same were set aside according to which the petition was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Talagang lawyer
