Find a Lawyer

APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH FACTORY MANAGER versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.9 MULTAN

Sections 6 (2) (i), 8, 9 and 48 (3) Registration of Trade Unions Appeal to the Registrar of the High Court, the trade unions dismissed the union's petition for registration but the Labor Court ordered the registrar. Allowed to appeal against, instructing them to register the only ground of the union to which the Labor Court had allowed the appeal was that the registrar had failed to object within 15 days of filing the application, thus Delivery was not mandatory with regard to the time and the law required the Registrar of Trade Unions to satisfy itself. That a trade union had complied with all the terms of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 and it was satisfied that the law prohibited the registration of the trade union with the registrar and removed all union office holders from the union. And they were no longer serving him. The Employer Mills Registrar, in the circumstances, cannot be satisfied that the provisions of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002 were complied with by other persons. The e-trade union was not entitled to registration; in the absence of the presence of the conditions mentioned in section 6 (2) (i) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, the impeachment order approved by the Labor Court was set aside by the High Court. ? Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer